Jd Kraus Portfolio
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Video Production
  • Color Grading & Photography
  • Graphics & Animation
  • Film Production
  • Kraus Critic
  • My Books
  • Audio Design
  • College Collage

Kraus Critic

Blue (2018) Film Review

7/3/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Blue. A color? A mood? A person’s name? The film does not address the title. It is about a Helen (Callie Shuttera), a young woman who has no luck. She loses her job, her ailing grandmother dies, and she faces insurmountable debt. Helen tries to take the easy route via suicide. At first, it seems fate has a cruel sense of humor, allowing her to survive with no family and a mountain high bill pile. As Helen continues her journey, she meets a small group of people who cheer her on toward success: a wealthy but pleasant business named Robert (Shaw Jones), a chirpy nurse (Laura Nicole Harrison), and a cold doctor (Judith Scott). The question we wonder through the film is whether Helen will persevere or relapse. A particularly poignant scene depicts a group therapy session where real live attempted suicide victims share their stories. These moments are gut-wrenching, but also cathartic and a little bit refreshing. They are real, captured with a cinema verite quality. The harsh reality is enough to move any sensible person.

​While the themes of suicide and self-injury are prominent factors in “Blue,” the film does not fall into the traps of predictable plot devices or clichés (although there is a point in the story that feels rushed). Nor does this movie come off as being overly pretentious. Rather the movie’s central focus is on Helen and her relationships with meeting new people. There are several well-written scenes between Helen and Robert, which evoke both subtle brilliance and clever wittiness. Not to spoil too much, but my personal favorite is a moment where the two main characters visit a laser tag, have fun, and then share a joint afterwards. I mean, who hasn’t done this?
Picture
As a character-driven film, “Blue” relies heavily on the cast’s performances. There are no weaknesses here. Callie Shuttera brings a burning passion to the lead character, delivering a strong and heartfelt performance. Shaw Jones offers a gentler performance as the quirky Robert, which works very well for his character. The other performers are superb in their respective roles. Chelsea Lopez as “Crazy” Ruby is a real screen stealer. 

For an independent movie, “Blue” looks like a million-dollar picture. The cinematography is beautiful and stunning. The sets are clean and polished. And the editing is crisp and seamless. The score is minimalistic, primarily solo piano with light percussion. However, the “Zimmer” factor is a bit heavy in one key scene. This is a movie that proves what a group of talented filmmakers can make with a shoe-string budget. Most great movies are about people trying to resolve an issue. “Blue” is one of those films. This is a picture that demands our surrender to its’ acting, writing, filmmaking and above all its’ exploration of an issue that the media and society glaringly overlooks.
Picture
Me at the Hobnobben Film Festival with Callie Shuttera (left) and Gabriella Ledesma (right).
0 Comments

Silence Film Review

1/21/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture
The year is 1640. The Catholic Church has spread all over the world, yet one nation has been labeled a danger. That is Japan. Two Jesuit Priests, Father Rodriguez (Andrew Garfield) and Father Garupe (Adam Driver) receive word that their former master Ferrerira (Liam Neeson) has apostatized. Believing this a lie, the two priests embark on a journey to the foreign land, hoping to discover the truth of their teacher. The Priests’ quest proves more burdensome than they had expected, putting their lives in danger and faith to the test.
 
Dubbed as his passion project, Scorsese explores many deep, philosophical questions in Silence. Is there a God? If so, why does he permit so much suffering? Is it mere arrogance and selfishness to hold onto one’s faith at the expense of other people’s lives? There is much to meditate and reflect upon in this film. At times, Silence is very hard to watch. While not particularly bloody, unlike some of Scorsese’s other movies, the brutal acts depicted feel very real.

Aside from the controversial subject matter, Silence is an excellent character study on Father Rodriguez and Garupe. We get to see how they change and ultimately follow two different paths. Andrew Garfield turns in his best work as Father Rodriguez. Adam Driver is equally brilliant. Liam Neeson has minimal screen time, but delivers one of his finest performances. He can convey so much emotion without speaking. There is more to his acting capability than Bryan Mills from Taken. Isse Ogata is evil and manipulative as the Japanese Inquisitor. He can be charming one moment and vile the next, a sort of Doctor Jekyll/Mr. Hyde personality. The rest of the supporting cast are also great in their respective roles.
Picture
​Like most other movies by Scorsese, the production values are top-notched. Rodrigo Prieto’s cinematography is simply stunning. Each shot is a work of exceptional art, whether it is a close-up on an actor’s face or a beautiful landscape image. Prieto has a phenomenal eye for composition and lighting, proving himself as one of Hollywood’s best DP’s. The production and costume designs are exquisite, capturing a lost era. The make-up design accommodates the ugliness and lack of personal hygiene people had centuries ago. We don’t see actors with pearly white teeth or unblemished skin.
 
The use of sound or rather lack thereof is particularly unique. There are moments where it is completely silent. The visuals take priority, allowing the audience a chance to absorb the character’s emotions. This technique works very well. The fact Silence does not have a music soundtrack makes it even powerful. So many films rely on music to convey an emotional response in the viewer. The visuals, performances, and story do this for the movie.
 
The only criticism I have is the pace. The first two hours move steadily but the ending drags a bit. It is almost as if the screenwriters wanted to add more to the story than it needed. In my opinion, a shorter ending would have given the film a much stronger resolution.
 
With such a huge filmmaking career that Scorsese has developed over the years, it is hard for me to rank this as one of his best. He has made so many excellent movies. Silence is a great one. That’s for sure – one of 2016’s best.
1 Comment

Arrival: Film Review

11/30/2016

0 Comments

 
​While most modern-day sci-fi flicks focus on extravagant CG set pieces and mindless destruction, Denis Villeneuve’s film “Arrival” offers the viewer something much more profound and thought-provoking. As twelve canoe-shaped spaceships touch down on earth, linguistics professor Louise Banks (Amy Adams) and scientist Ian Donnelly (Jeremy Renner) are recruited by the US government to investigate the purpose of the newly arrived extraterrestrials. 
Picture
​The plot focuses on how Banks and Donnelly attempt to communicate with the aliens and understand their mission. Rather than this process being tedious or even boring, screenwriter Eric Heisserer constructs an interesting and well-crafted story, built on mystery, tension and intrigue. As a viewer, I wanted to know about the aliens identity, their mission, and whether humanity will go to war or if a compromise could be made. The tension is astronomically well done. I kept guessing till the end and was pleasantly surprised with the final outcome. The creativity of the alien language and the use of linguistics help make the film even more plausible. Without giving too much away, it is amazing how a simple set of words could easily be misinterpreted or construed. That’s one of the several underlying themes of this movie, how people make quick judgments without fully comprehending the meaning of another individual’s, or in this case, an aliens’ perspective. Language can be a powerful weapon.

Picture
​The visuals and aesthetics of “Arrival” are simply astounding. The sheer scale of the alien spacecrafts is terrifying and unique. Even though the aliens resemble large cephalopods, they pose as a powerful and foreboding force. Bradford Young’s cinematography consists of dimly lit interior rooms, sometimes only lit with computer screens, and overexposed exterior shots. His choice of lighting and camera angles makes the movie feel real, almost like a documentary versus a studio lit scene from a soundstage. But the component I enjoyed the most was the sound design. Some scenes are deathly quiet and then bang, something loud happens. This technique made me feel like I was part of the movie. Johann Johannson’s score takes the film’s sound to a new level. He conveys something intense, magical, and above out of this world (I hope he wins an Oscar). Max Richter’s piece “On the Nature of Daylight” adds an additional layer of emotion to this great film.
Picture
​The final highlights of what makes “Arrival” an excellent alien contact movie are the performances. Renner is solid as Donnelly, determined to a find scientific way to communicate with the aliens. It is nice to see him take more dramatic roles rather than playing Hawkeye from “Marvel’s: The Avenger’s.” Amy Adams as Dr. Banks could easily receive her sixth Oscar nomination. Her performance is based on subtlety, particularly with her movements and facial expressions. She can express so much emotion without uttering a single word. Instances like these are what can make an actor either really good or bad. Adams is simply wonderful. 

2016 still has quite a few movies left to hit the theaters. So far, “Arrival” is the best one I have seen.

0 Comments

2016 Oscar Predictions

2/23/2016

0 Comments

 
Since 2006, I have predicted the winners at the Oscars. I admit, my accuracy has been hit-or-miss. This is the second year I have posted my predictions. In addition to my predictions, I have also added who I think should win. My predictions do not always correlate with my preference winners.
​Best Picture of the Year
Probably Will Win: The Revenant                 
Prefer to Win: Spotlight

Best Actor in a Lead Role
Probably Will Win: Leo Dicaprio for The Revenant     
Prefer to Win: Leo Dicaprio for The Revenant

Best Actress in a Lead Role
Probably Will Win: Brie Larson for Room   
Prefer to Win: Brie Larson for Room

Best Actor in a Supporting Role
Probably Will Win: Sylvester Stallone for Creed
Prefer to Win: Tom Hardy for The Revenant

Best Actress in a Supporting Role
Probably Will Win: Alicia Vikander for The Danish Girl
Prefer to Win: Alicia Vikander for The Danish Girl

Best Director
Probably Will Win: Alejandro G. for The Revenant
Prefer to Win: Tom McCarthy for Spotlight

Best Original Screenplay
Probably Will Win: Spotlight
Prefer to Win: Spotlight

Best Adapted Screenplay
Probably Will Win: The Big Short
Prefer to Win: The Big Short
Picture
Best Cinematography
Probably Will Win: The Revenant
Prefer to Win: The Revenant

Best Costume Design
Probably Will Win: Mad Max: Fury Road
Prefer to Win: Carol

Best Production/Set Design
Probably Will Win: Mad Max: Fury Road
Prefer to Win: The Martian

Best Editing
Probably Will Win: Mad Max: Fury Road
Prefer to Win: The Big Short

Best Sound Mixing
Probably Will Win: The Revenant
Prefer to Win: The Revenant

Best Sound Editing
Probably Will Win: Mad Max: Fury Road
Prefer to Win: Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens

Best Visual Effects
Probably Will Win: Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens
Prefer to Win: Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens

Best Make-Up & Hairstyling
Probably Will Win: Mad Max: Fury Road
Prefer to Win: The Revenant

Best Original Music Score
Probably Will Win: The Hateful Eight
Prefer to Win: The Hateful Eight

Best Song
Probably Will Win: Spectre “The Writings on the Wall”
Prefer to Win: Spectre “The Writings on the Wall” 

Best Animated Film
Probably Will Win: Inside Out
Prefer to Win: Inside Out

Best Documentary Film
Probably Will Win: Amy
Prefer to Win: Winter on Fire: Ukraine’s Fight for Freedom

Best Foreign Film
Probably Will Win: Son of Saul
Prefer to Win: Son of Saul
Picture
In conclusion, I think The Revenant will set Oscar history. Leo will finally win his first Academy Award. Emmanuel Lubezki will win his third Oscar consecutively, and Alejandro G. will take home his second Best Director Award in a row.

Most importantly, I hope Ennio Morricone receives his long overdue Oscar for the chilling music he composed for The Hateful Eight. This marks his sixth nomination. It's about time he wins. While loved by fans and critics, I think Mad Max: Fury Road will mainly clean out the technical awards. Hopefully, the academy will be nice and give Star Wars 7 a well-earned and much needed Oscar for VFX. As an aside, I base most of my predictions off of the BAFTAs and Guild Awards.

My final prediction tally.

The Revenant: 5
Mad Max: Fury Road: 5
Star Wars 7: 1
Spotlight: 1
The Big Short: 1
Room: 1
Creed: 1
The Danish Girl: 1
The Hateful Eight: 1
Inside Out: 1
Spectre: 1
Son of Saul: 1
Amy: 1

I have not listed any of my predictions for the documentary and animation shorts. This is because I often don't predict them; I never get a chance to view them anyway, which defeats the purpose.
0 Comments

Movie Review: The Hateful Eight

1/7/2016

0 Comments

 
​A winter storm sweeps through the mountainous Wyoming valley as eight individuals shelter in a log cabin. Each person seems upfront and friendly, but not all of them are who they claim to be. The characters include John Ruth (Kurt Russell), a bounty hunter bringing in Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh) a crazy little minx, to hang; Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), also a bounty hunter collecting some reward money, a town sheriff (Walter Goggins), the town’s hangman (Tim Roth), a former colonel (Bruce Dern), and the cabin’s caretaker (Damien Bicher). In a “who done it” storytelling fashion, the characters figures out the hidden truths and turn on another one.
Picture
Writer and director Quentin Tarantino approaches his eighth film like a play. He takes his time unraveling the story as the characters engage in idle conversations through the blustery storm. QT is a master of witty dialog and has a talent where he can have his characters talk endlessly about irrelevant matters to the movie’s plot, yet remain entertaining and enthralling. While this worked flawlessly in “Inglourious Basterds” and “Django Unchained,” in “The Hateful Eight” it drags the story out longer than necessary. After awhile, the dialog feels very long-winded. If Tarantino wanted to emphasize the boredom of being secluded in a cabin during a storm, he certainly achieves that. There are still some very well written scenes though, such as a reoccurring gag where each character asks John Ruth why he is bringing Daisy in alive when it is just simpler to shoot her in the back. The punch line, “It’s too much work to bring ‘em in alive” will go down as a classic Tarantino movie line.
​
Without giving too much more away, the “surprise” twist is very predictable. In Tarantino style, people die gruesomely. Shot, stabbed, hanged, poisoned, bled to death, take your pick. Unlike other QT movies where the violence seems justified, “The Hateful Eight” depicts violence just for the sake of it. The last on-camera death specifically displays a disturbing act of pure sadism. I never really felt uncomfortable watching a Tarantino movie. This one actually bothered me a little.
Picture
There are some more worthwhile factors that “The Hateful Eight” offers. Shot in 70mm film, the landscape shots pay homage to the old Westerns. Cinematographer Robert Richardson has once again shown his talent as one of Hollywood’s greatest DPs. Ennio Morricone’s score is haunting to say the least, but also has the soul he created from the Spaghetti Westerns. Both are probably in luck for some Oscar nominations this year.
​
To sum up, “The Hateful Eight” is merely decent. The acting is good. The technical skills are phenomenal. But the story is weak, but fortunately has some of the flare QT that audiences have seen before, just not enough to make another masterpiece.
0 Comments

Movie Review: Beasts of No Nation

12/13/2015

0 Comments

 
​This is the movie that made me join Netflix. The trailers looked very promising, and the film does not disappoint. The plot is told from the perspective of Agu (Abraham Attah), a child growing up in an unnamed African country. The first fifteen minutes provides a sense of calm and general happiness, emphasizing the childhood innocence of this boy. He has a loving family and a wild imagination. The story takes a dramatic turn when war breaks out in Agu’s homeland, resulting in the separation from his family. Agu is forced into the army as a child soldier. While films like “Blood Diamond” and “Lord of War” scratch the surface on child soldiers in Africa, “Beasts of No Nation” takes you down to its core level. It is brutal, dark, and inhumane. As viewers, we watch as Agu transforms from an innocent boy to a brainwashed killer, under the manipulative powers of the Commandant (Idris Elba).
Picture
Director Cary Joji Fukunaga does not sugercoat the barbarity. There are several moments intended to make the viewer uncomfortable, including a harsh scene where a young girl is stomped to death while a group of child soldiers laugh. Despite the graphic violence, Fukunaga does not demonize the children. The director provides us moments where the child soldiers are simply children. They play games and question what their futures will bring. It cannot be said that we necessarily like them, but given their circumstances and the lifestyle that has been forced onto them, they are understandable characters.

While Idris Elba has been receiving nominations (including a Golden Globe & SAG) for his role, it is Abraham Attah’s performance that makes the movie. He has a talent that most child actors, and many adult-aged actors lack, the ability to convey powerful emotion without uttering a single word. Though unlikely, I hope he secures an Oscar nom for his performance. Idris Elba is convincing as the manipulative and despicable Commandant, but his British accent breaks through on several occasions, pulling me out of several key scenes. 
Picture
The technical skills and Fakunaga’s direction are nothing short of remarkable. Fakunaga acted as his own cinematographer for this movie and he does an incredible job. In some instances, he seemed to shadow Terrence Malick’s work from “The Thin Red Line” with his selection of beautiful landscape shots, close-ups of nature, high saturation and natural lighting. The voice-over by Agu adds another layer to this compelling film as he reflects on his past experiences as a soldier.

While this is a very good movie, it is not without faults. The last act feels drawn out, making it longer than necessary. The conclusion is particularly weak and withholds any catharsis from the character. A more glaring problem was the thick African accents. They made the English dialogue very hard to understand. It would have been more appropriate if all the characters spoke in their native language and then subtitles were added after the fact. The first fifteen minutes were mostly subtitled, as the rest of the film should have been.

2016 has not been the best year of movies. However, December is the month where the greatest films are usually released. “Beasts of No Nation” is a compelling and powerful film, and marks one of this year’s best. But I would not rank it as one of the best of all time.
0 Comments

2015 Oscar Predictions

2/18/2015

0 Comments

 
For nearly a decade, I have predicted the Oscar winners. Last year, I got a personal record of 22 out of 24 categories right. Rather than listing all the categories by order, I have arranged the movies in order from the biggest winner to the single winners. I base my predictions off of the BAFTA and Guild Award Winners. 

Now, the movie with the most likely chance of winning the most awards. 

For the following categories:

Best Achievement in Art Direction/Production

Best Achievement in Costume Design

Best Writing for an Original Screenplay

Best Achievement in Original Musical Writing 

Will all most likely go to….

Picture

For the Categories of

Best Performance for an Actress in a Supporting Role

Best Film Editing

The Oscars will most likely go to….
 
Picture

For Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role and Best Adapted Screenplay

The Oscars will most likely go to….
Picture

For the following categories:

Best Achievement in Directing


Best Achievement in Cinematography


Best Picture of the Year

Will most likely go to… 
Picture
For the categories of Best Actor in a Supporting Role and Best Sound Mixing, 

The Oscars will most likely go to:
Picture
For Best Actress in a Leading Role

The Oscar will most likely go to: 
Picture

For Best Achievement in Sound Editing

The Oscar will probably go to:
Picture

For Best Achievement in Visual Effects


The Oscar will possibly go to... 
Picture

For Best Original Song

The Oscar will possibly go to...
Picture

For Best Animated Feature

The Oscar will go to...
Picture

For Best Foreign Film

The Oscar will go to:
Picture

For Best Documentary Film

The Oscar will go to:
Picture

For Best Achievement in Make-up & Hairstyling


The Oscar might go to: 
Picture

Final Tally:

The Grand Budapest Hotel: 4
Boyhood: 2
The Theory of Everything: 2
Birdman or the Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance: 3
Whiplash: 2
Still Alice: 1
American Sniper: 1
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes: 1
Selma: 1
How To Train Your Dragon II: 1
Ida: 1
Citizenfour: 1
Guardians of the Galaxy: 1

I don't keep of the animation, video, and documentary shorts for I usually never get them right. Last year was the exception though. I do have some doubts about my choices. Interstellar makes a contender for the Visual Effects and Sound Categories and finger crossed, Michael Keaton might snag the Best Actor Award. We will see though on this Sunday! The Academy can have their surprise winners. 
0 Comments

Foxcatcher - Movie Review

1/29/2015

0 Comments

 
While “Foxcatcher” is inspired by real people and events the film’s roots are in a psychological examination of its lonesome and disturbed characters. Channing Tatum plays Mark Schultz, the 1984 Gold Medalist in Men’s Wrestling. Going nowhere with employment and training, he receives a chance of a lifetime from being recruited by John E du Pont (Carrel), a reserved and awkward multi-millionaire, who wants America to win the gold again in the 1988 Olympics. At Du Pont’s mother’s farm, he organizes the new US wrestling team for the International games. Their relationship becomes the basis of this film and how it rises and then ultimately deflates.
Picture
From the first five minutes we are introduced to Du Pont, he is presented as a wealthy, charismatic individual with a peculiar way of speaking and an even more peculiar nose. Progressively, we get to see the type of man Mark has befriended as he spirals out of control, engaging in drug abuse, guns, and irrational behavior. Carrel has performed a role at first glance may seem hard to swallow. However, he portrays his character in such a style that it is truly terrifying. Beneath the hours of make-up, he can display absolute nothingness, uncontrollable rage, and even pure narcissism without even speaking. Director Bennett Miller relies heavily on non-verbal scenes, allowing the silence between the actors on camera to create tension and intriguing interactions. This is a tough accomplishment, and he hits it head-on at every point. 

Picture
The screenwriters supply the actors with straight-to-the-point, yet brilliant dialog, and the cast carry the weight of their characters superbly. Who could have imagined that Channing Tatum or even Steve Carrel could deliver such vulnerable and sophisticated characters? Mark Ruffalo is extremely limited in screen time but he is up to par with his leading co-stars as Mark’s caring brother. The only setback “Foxcatcher” has is the ending. The first 100 minutes are electrifying and engaging, but the final 20-30 minutes kind of meander and depict a series of events that feel thrown in together. Too much of Carrel and Tatum looking depressed make a snail’s pace for this timeframe. I wanted more character interaction and an actual conclusion that ties in with the violent tragedy of Dave Schultz’s murder. It merely happens and Du Pont is arrested. No trial. No final face-to-face showdown between Mark and Du Pont. Not even a moment where Mark mourns his brother. As a viewer, the ending is quite cold and rather withholding.

“Foxcatcher” is a great movie. I would definitely buy it when the Blu-Ray hits retail stores. Yet I don’t think it is as great as some of the other movies released in 2014. 

0 Comments

American Sniper - Film Review 

1/29/2015

1 Comment

 
“American Sniper” is a movie that can be very easily interpreted as American propaganda. The use of the word “American” in the film’s title is enough for some to make this claim. The motto “God, country, and family” rings true to mind in what this film depicts. In actuality though, “American Sniper” is a feature that takes a patriotic individual, hoists him up as a legend and then brings him back down to the harsh level of a haunted soul. Clint Eastwood is a master director who knows how to show the flawed and imperfect nature of humanity. Just watch “Unforgiven,” “Mystic River,” and “Letters of Iwo Jima.”
Picture
With US Seal Sniper Chris Kyle, he is portrayed as an unsophisticated character. From youth, we get to see his life grow from a god-fearing hunter who dreams of being a cowboy to the deadliest sniper in American history. In response to 9/11, just like many American men and women, he enlists in the Navy to serve his country. We watch as he endures four tours of active duty in Iraq and tries to readjust in the safe confines of suburban America. Writer Jason Hall molds him as a sympathetic and likable person, whom is determined to eliminate the enemy and protect his home.

It is Bradley Cooper’s deeply expressive performance that captures the essence of this simple yet larger-than-life person. As an actor, Cooper has acquired a power to display in both voice and face great emotion. Without him even uttering a word, we can comprehend the thoughts going on in his head. His performance is nothing short of deserving an Oscar nomination. Clint Eastwood smartly keeps the camera on him for the majority of the film, allowing the audience to empathize and understand his character. He also gives us a parched, desolate, desert landscape plagued by violence and cruelty. The amount of dedication in the cinematography and production design give viewers a gritty look of Iraq, which rivals Kathryn Bigelow’s “The Hurt Locker.” The war sequences are quite brutal and intense. The final action scene alone is truly marvelous as a sandstorm blankets the battle-stricken Baghdad.
Picture
“American Sniper” unfortunately falls short on many other aspects, dragging what could have been a great movie down to mediocrity. While the focus is on Kyle, other parts of his life are introduced and then just as quickly dismissed. We get to see his younger brother join up the marines and then we never see him again. Likewise, the relationship between his strict father takes precedent in the first ten-minutes, and yet it goes nowhere afterwards. His war buddies appear, disappear, and then reappear usually for a plot device. As a viewer, we barely get a chance to know them like Kyle. When they are killed off, we really do not feel any emotional engagement or loss. The added subplot of a Middle Eastern sniper targeting US Soldiers feels clichéd and a poor attempt to draw a main antagonist for the lead character. Even the relationship between Kyle and his wife is limited in time. We are left with following a great American patriot consumed with torment. The frequent jumps between war and home grows old very quickly. An entire movie could have been just based upon one of Kyle’s tours and it would feel like a more completed film. 
Picture
In short, this movie left me wanting more than the 132-minutes had to offer. That is the sad problem with most biographical films. They are spread so thin that they actually show too little in too much time. I’m probably in the minority on this one, but “American Sniper” is a slightly above average film, and that is mainly because of Bradley Cooper’s performance. I wanted to love this, but I cannot. Regardless, I still appreciate the people who brought Chris Kyle’s story back to life.

1 Comment

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies Review

12/28/2014

0 Comments

 
The final stretch of The Hobbit Trilogy possesses visual awe, energy, and a darker tone to Peter Jackson's vision of Middle-earth. Picking up directly from his previous film, Jackson grips our attention with an intense CG fire-show, as the dragon Smaug sets the fishing port, Laketown ablaze. The sequence is so fun, that one quickly understands why audience members go see the movies. We can now know why Peter Jackson has forced us to hold our breathe for a whole another year for this big showdown. It was well worth the wait and is a witty method to catch the audience's attention for the first ten minutes of the movie. 

Picture
With the desolation of Smaug being used as an introduction, the remainder of the film centers on its descriptive title, "The Battle of the Five Armies." Elves, dwarfs, men, and orcs on a scale that rivals the grand siege of Minas Tirith from "The Return of the King" face off and battle at the gates of the newly reclaimed city of Erebor. Though there is an abundance of action and subplots that are put to work simultaneously, the essential focus is on Thorin Oakenshield. Richard Armitage in the role as Thorin captures the essence of an individual consumed by greed in a very frightening manner. He becomes paranoid thinking that one of his fellow dwarfs is withholding his precious jewel, the Arkenstone, from him. He barricades the old city from all other races, despite his promise of sharing his wealth with the people of Laketown. He even threatens to kill his own fellow companions if they get in his way. Like the "Lord of the Rings Trilogy" with Sauron's ring, the Arkenstone corrupts the mind of the hero. 
Picture
Interestingly, Bilbo Baggins takes more of a supporting role. Martin Freeman, who captured so well the transition from a character that was out of his element into a clever protagonist is unfortunately limited in screen time. He is not given a chance to add more depth or significance to the movie. Including 'The Hobbit' in the title is sort of misleading. Only until the end do we think, 'Oh wait! This movie is about Bilbo. Not Thorin.' 


For a 144-minute movie, the film is quick, but it feels too short in comparison to the other Hobbit films. The ending is particularly rushed and important details that are introduced earlier in the film are either not concluded or are completely disregarded, which as a viewer, made me scratch my head and think, 'Wait? What happens now to this elf character or this dwarf character, or even this human character?' Whether from the studios, time constraints, or just bad editing, the movie does not come off as entirely finished. Scenes of Ryan Gage as the witless Alfrid could have been replaced with much more substantial material. Hopefully the Extended Edition will help resolve these problems. 
Picture
The mightiest flaw that "The Battle of the Five Armies" faces is the lack of emotional engagement in the characters. Several important good guys die and while their deaths are unpleasant to watch, they never feel sad. The heightened musical score and slow-motion cinematography during these scenes are dull and a clichéd attempt to drive the viewer into an emotional state. It would be easier and more shocking for an important character to die quickly and suddenly versus being drug out like a dramatic opera performance. 

"The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" is not a dreadful movie by any means. Neither is it epic nor is it memorable. It does serve a purpose. It entertains well, despite its flaws, and there are many.


0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    JD Kraus is an aspiring writer and film-maker.

    Archives

    July 2018
    January 2017
    November 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly